About UsMembershipCalendar of EventsProfessional DevelopmentLegislative AffairsRegulatory AffairsPublic RelationsForeign Bank SupervisionMortgage Licensing
Regulatory Affairs
 Regulatory Division Committees
 Regulatory Newsbytes
 Comment Letters
 Proposals and Policy Positions
 Federal Agency Guidance Database
 Federal Preemption
 Supervisory Agreements/Applications
 Predatory Lending
 Bank Secrecy Act
 Pandemic Planning
 Miscellaneous
 CSBS Examiner Pool
 Applied Technology Website
 Profile
 Examiner Resource Links
 Emergency Protocols & Communication
 Mortgage Policy
            
 
January 11, 2002


The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing to ask you not to include in your 2003 budget the requirement for new federal fees on state-chartered banks and bank holding companies. As you know, both the House and the Senate have rejected this proposal for the last eight years. In fact, the Senate unanimously rejected this proposal last year by adopting the Enzi -Carper amendment to the budget that was co-sponsored by eighteen Senators.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) has repeatedly opposed this new tax on state-chartered institutions in previous budget proposals, and highlighted the destructive impact of this tax on the dual banking system ? a system that has served our communities and national economy so well. CSBS is the professional association of state and territorial officials who charter, examine, supervise, and regulate the nation's approximately 6,400 state-chartered banks and nearly 400 state-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks.

At present, the fee structure for federally-chartered and state-chartered banks is identical: both pay their chartering organization for their examinations, and pay deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC. This fee structure is a linchpin of the dual banking system. A new federal fee would seriously handicap state-chartered institutions, damaging the dual banking system.

Imposing additional direct federal fees on state-chartered institutions will not increase bank safety and soundness. No additional examinations will occur, only additional costs. State bank exam fees are generally much lower than those charged by the OCC. States have worked hard to keep these fees low and are proud of their efficient, effective state banking departments. Past budget proposals to increase exam fees have claimed to ?reduce the inequity? among FDIC-insured banks, but in effect would have punished state-chartered banks for choosing more cost-effective supervision, and punished bank holding companies for choosing that structure.

State-chartered banks, which the members of CSBS supervise and regulate, are important engines of local economic development. They are the primary lenders to small businesses, which, as you know, create the vast majority of new jobs in the United States. They have also been innovators in providing new products and services to their customers.

Congress has rejected new federal fees on state-chartered banks on eight separate occasions. We urge you to reject this proposal in your 2003 budget. Enclosed are the budget views of the House Financial Services and Senate Banking Committees as well as a letter from Senate Banking Committee members in opposition to these new exam fees.

We look forward to working with you to strengthen our financial services system, and thank you for your consideration. Please call upon us whenever we can be of assistance to you and your Administration.

Best personal regards,

Neil Milner
President and CEO

Terms of UsePrivacy Policy
CSBS 1155 Connecticut Ave NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20036-4306 Tel. 202.296.2840 Fax. 202.296.1928