Skip to main content

CSBS Letter Supporting State Supervisor on FDIC Board

The Honorable Mick Mulvaney
Acting Chief of Staff
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Director Mulvaney:

On behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), I am writing to stress the importance of the existing legal requirement that at least one member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Board of Directors have experience working in state government as a state bank supervisor. We are concerned about recent reports of prospective nominees to the FDIC Board who do not meet this requirement.

About CSBS

We are grateful for your interactions last year with CSBS and our members during your time with the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. As you might recall, CSBS is the nationwide organization of banking regulators from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. State bank regulators charter and supervise more than 4,300 banks, representing nearly 79 percent of the nation’s banks. The mission of CSBS is to support the leadership role of state banking supervisors in

  • advancing the state banking system;
  • ensuring a safe and sound financial services marketplace;
  • promoting economic growth and consumer protection; and
  • fostering innovative state regulation of the financial services industry.

Most state banking departments also license and regulate a variety of non-bank financial services providers such as mortgage lenders, consumer lenders, and money transmitters. State regulators’ broad but local mandate provides them with a unique, holistic view of credit markets, hands-on experience with new and innovative financial products and services, and a tangible perspective on how financial regulation impacts the daily lives of consumers.

State Bank Regulator Representation on the FDIC Board

The United States has the most diverse and dynamic banking system in the world, made up of a wide variety of institutions such as global financial services firms, mid-sized and regional institutions, and local community banks. This robust banking market is made possible by our dual banking system – a system that allows for both state and federal chartering of banks, state and federal financial services industry oversight, and a balance between state and federal roles in financial regulation. Our financial system benefits from the respective expertise of state and federal regulators working together, and Congress has sought to ensure this coordination and balance by requiring that various federal regulatory agencies include individuals with state bank regulatory experience. Moreover, as locally accountable regulators, state bank supervisors have a unique understanding of the critical role state-chartered community banks play in local economic development, small business lending and job creation, and the financial well-being of consumers.

With respect to the FDIC Board, since 1996 the Federal Deposit Insurance Act has required that at least one of its three independent directors have “State bank supervisory experience.”1 The letter and the spirit of the law, as well as its legislative history, all indicate that this requirement is only met by a person who has worked in state government as a supervisor of state-chartered banks, and as Congress noted, someone with “state bank regulatory expertise and sensitivity to the issues confronting the dual banking system.”2

Current and potential vacancies on the FDIC Board provide the Administration with the opportunity to fulfill this legal obligation. Furthermore, meeting the FDI Act’s membership requirements will reinforce the notion that state-federal regulatory coordination and collaboration are essential to ensuring a healthy, vibrant, and stable banking system. We look forward to working with the Administration to fill this important position. We look forward to working with you to ensure letter and the spirit of the law are met.

Sincerely,

John W. Ryan
President and CEO

cc: Mr. Sean Doocey, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Presidential Personnel Mr. Andrew Olmem, Deputy Director for Domestic Policy, National Economic Council


1 12 U.S.C. § 1812(a)(1).
2 S. Rept. 104-185, Report of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 650, The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act, beginning at p. 13.

 

Recent Posts

Policy
The proposed rule states that currently, validation notices, combined with the limited disclosure of consumers’ rights with respect to debt collection, may limit a consumer’s ability to fully exercise their dispute rights.
Sep 19, 2019
Policy
The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC 20510   The Honorable Charles Schumer Minority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
Sep 11, 2019
Policy
State regulators believe this framework has been effective in protecting consumers. The proposed amendments to the Safeguards Rule would bolster the consumer protections ensured by the rule and would not prevent states from imposing stricter…
Jul 31, 2019
Policy
Lise Kruse testifies for before the Appraisal Subcommittee regarding a temporary waiver for appraisers in North Dakota
Jul 18, 2019
exit