Skip to main content

CSBS Opposes Provisions in H.R. 6741, the Federal Reserve Reform Act of 2018

The Honorable Jeb Hensarling Chairman
House Committee on Financial Services
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Hensarling:

On behalf of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS),1 I am writing to express state regulators’ opposition to provisions in Section 7 of the “Federal Reserve Reform Act of 2018” (H.R. 6741) that would impose a tax on state-chartered banks. Among other things, Section 7 calls on the Federal Reserve to assess new fees on state-chartered banks to cover the cost of the Federal Reserve’s bank supervision activities.

State banking regulators charter and supervise approximately 4,400 institutions, representing nearly 79 percent of the nation’s banks. Thousands of state-chartered banks are supervised by the Federal Reserve to some degree, and would be negatively impacted by this proposal, including:

  • Over 800 state-chartered member banks;
  • Approximately 2,700 state non-member banks with a holding company; and
  • Hundreds of state-licensed foreign bank branches and agencies.

While none of these banking organizations would receive any new supervisory benefit from the Federal Reserve, they would undoubtedly pay more for the same level of supervision.
Additionally, these exam fees will hit the smallest, state-chartered community banks the hardest, and will divert money that could otherwise be put to work in their communities.

Beyond its direct impact on individual institutions, this change in Federal Reserve funding would upset the balance of the dual banking system and further threaten the diversity of our nation’s banking industry. These bank exam fee proposals create regulatory uncertainty that undermines the regulatory choice that is fundamental to the dual banking system, and diminishes the role of locally accountable state regulators, forcing a bias toward, centralized, inside-the-beltway federal bank supervision.

We appreciate the broader objective of increasing oversight and accountability of the federal financial regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve, and the work you and the House Financial Services Committee have done. These goals can be accomplished without imposing new exam fees on state-chartered banks, and CSBS looks forward to working with you to ensure this outcome.

Sincerely,

John W. Ryan President and CEO

cc:    The Hon. Maxine Waters, Ranking Member, House Financial Services Committee The Hon. Andy  Barr, Chairman, Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade
The Hon. Gwen Moore, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade


1 CSBS is the nationwide organization of banking regulators from all 50 states, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. For more than a century, CSBS has given state supervisors a national forum to coordinate supervision of their regulated entities and to develop regulatory policy.

Recent Posts

Policy
The proposed rule states that currently, validation notices, combined with the limited disclosure of consumers’ rights with respect to debt collection, may limit a consumer’s ability to fully exercise their dispute rights.
Sep 19, 2019
Policy
The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC 20510   The Honorable Charles Schumer Minority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
Sep 11, 2019
Policy
State regulators believe this framework has been effective in protecting consumers. The proposed amendments to the Safeguards Rule would bolster the consumer protections ensured by the rule and would not prevent states from imposing stricter…
Jul 31, 2019
Policy
Lise Kruse testifies for before the Appraisal Subcommittee regarding a temporary waiver for appraisers in North Dakota
Jul 18, 2019
exit