Skip to main content

Impact of Bank Failure is Sometimes Greater Than the Sum of its Parts

Staff at the Research and Statistics Division of the Federal Reserve Board recently published a working paper examining whether financial stress at small banks has a different impact on the real economy than financial stress at larger banks. 

The working paper estimates that the failure of a single large banking organization with an assumed $100 billion in deposits would result in approximately a 107 percent decline in quarterly real GDP growth, whereas stress among five smaller banking organizations—each with an assumed $20 billion in deposits—would result in roughly a 22 percent decline in quarterly real GDP growth. 

The paper is an important contribution to the research on the connection between bank size and systemic risk. The findings of the paper are critical to keep in mind as federal regulators seek to tailor regulations applicable to large and small banks while limiting potential damage to the economy in future financial crises. 

Recent Blog Posts

Blog post
Through CSBS Vision 2020, state regulators are implementing a series of initiatives to better harmonize the multistate regulatory experience for nonbanks, including fintechs
Feb 19, 2019
Blog post
States have a history of states working together to harmonize multistate regulation. The benefit: the efficiencies of a national system combined with the local accountability of regulated institutions.
Feb 18, 2019
Blog post
The community bank leverage ratio proposed by federal regulators would result in regulatory burden that exceeds any relief provided due to the proposed new prompt corrective action framework.
Feb 15, 2019
Blog post
Community banks are making structural changes as they fully embrace technology solutions. As technology solutions have become mission critical, technology-related roles are less likely to be a piece of someone’s job.
Feb 8, 2019