Skip to main content

Initial Reactions to Multistate Compact on MSB Licensing

On the heels of news that seven states agreed to a multi-state compact that will significantly streamline the licensing process for fintechs and other money services businesses, reporters and financial services experts sounded off on the compact.

American Banker:

“This is something that we can do to create licensing efficiencies with these companies, hopefully help get them off the ground and it doesn’t sacrifice consumer protection,” Charlie Clark, agency deputy director and director of consumer services at the Washington Department of Financial Institutions, said in an interview...

Creating a more uniform licensing process is a part of a larger strategy launched last May called Vision 2020 in which the state regulators are trying to streamline state regulation to help fintech firms and other nonbank money-services businesses, called MSBs.

“This MSB licensing agreement will minimize the burden of regulatory licensing, use state resources more efficiently, and allow for broad participation by other states across the country,” John Ryan, the president and CEO of the bank supervisor group, said in a press release.

The pilot program could also help make a state license more attractive to fintech firms that are debating whether to do business by state or wait for a federal regulator to create a national charter.

Bloomberg:

The states’ agreement is likely to be welcome news to critics of the current system, who say the patchwork of state licensing statutes hampers growth in the fintech market.

Reuters:

The initiative responds to longstanding complaints by fintech startups about the costly and time consuming process of having to secure licenses separately in each state in order to operate in the United States.

Wall Street Journal:

A change in licensing requirements would be “positive,” [Marketplace Lenders Association Executive Director Nat] Hoopes said, “but we’re hoping that they would push beyond it to look at ways that would harmonize state law.”

The Chattanoogan: 

As technology in the financial services arena has advanced, state regulators have heard concerns from innovative start-ups providing money services about the difficulties of varying licensing requirements in multiple states and challenges about having their full application reviewed separately by each individual state before they can offer services nationwide.

Commissioner Greg Gonzales said: "With this initiative, state governments will be able to be responsive to business innovation while ensuring regulatory compliance."

Bloomberg BNA's Lydia Beyoud via Twitter:

This announcement from state regulators makes for an interest counter-point to the SEC and CFTC chairs' interest in a federal-level money transmitter regime for cryto exchanges.  

Recent Blog Posts

Blog post
The OCC has received zero opens innovation office hours, the Senate Banking Committee votes on nominations, California moves to allow state-chartered banks affected by wildfires to close, and more.
Aug 16, 2018
Blog post
Caution and skepticism are in order as the OCC looks to fit fintechs into the definition and standards of bank-level regulations and supervision
Aug 10, 2018
Blog post
A Treasury Department report released Tuesday criticizes the Education Department's oversight of the federal student loan program and calls on Congress to hold low-performing colleges more accountable.
Aug 1, 2018
Blog post
FDIC, FHA nominees confirmed. In progress: CFPB, Federal Reserve Board, Ginnie Mae, Office of Financial Research, SEC.
Jul 20, 2018